House of Representatives Essay

The US federal legislature is bicameral, in that locationfore it consists of the Senate and the shack of Representatives, and in theory they should both(prenominal) be of equal personnel. However, in reality it is the Senate which is considered to hold the most agency, although there are personal credit lines to in favour of them having equal rights. In order to attain a balanced judgement I will consider both sides of the argument, beginning with the claim that the Senate is more powerful than the House of Representatives.Senators represent an spotless state, as outgrowths of the House of Representatives only represent districts, highlighting from the outset their antithetical abilities to reach a broader spectrum of people, along with Senates organism 1 of 100, and House members being 1 of 435. Therefore Senators harbor an easier avenue to implement their blend, as a House representative has utmost less stance, due to them being far denser in numbers a clear example of this is that of Bill Frist who in January 2003 became majority leader after only eight geezerhood in the Senate. While at the same time Representative Nancy Pelosi became House minority leader, but she had been a member in the firm since 1987. This make headway highlights the great power of those with the senate to gain more status. Power within recounting is very a great deal concentrated within committees, rather than that of the Chamber floor in question, which further highlights the Senates greater status, as Senators are far more likely to check committees, which further heightens their status on Capitol Hill.Senators are known both state-wide and change surface some are known nationwide, as House members are principally known in neither category. As a typical American sitting in the public gallery of the senate probably would not cause difficulty in recognising such Senators as John McCain and John Kerry, as both experience been their partys professorshipial ca ndidate. This is a dissimilar story within the house as most people would be unable to recognise representatives other than their own up to now there have been few exceptions such as Ron Paul, although this does further highlight the lack of status the House members have and as a consequence hindered power. This point is okay up scour more by the time members have forrader they face re-elections, as in the Senate this period is every six years but only every two in the house. Consequently displaying the subtraction of House members being less important than that of Senators who have a seven-day period to make themselves known to their people and carry out their work without the hindrance of elections.The senate is widely seen as a launching pad for a presidential campaign, as chairs Obama, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy and Truman were all former members of the Senate. While no member of the House in recent years has been chosen to run for President apart from Ron Paul in 2012, sho wing the Senates dominance within Congress in this area, as further instilling this point is the fact that 14 out of the last 15 elections the Democrats have nominated a senator as their vice-presidential candidate. However, when it comes down to passing legislation the two chambers have mostly equal powers, as neither chamber can invalidate the decision made by the other, therefore the senate cannot dominate the House.Along with the command that both chambers must approve constitutional amendments, the House does however have exclusive powers over money bills, but this is overshadowed by the Senates exponent to ratify or even reject a treaty even though a super majority would be needed. The only power the House holds that would appear to make them more powerful is that over the president and Vice-President, as they have the ability to elect the resident in the obsolescent event of deadlock within the Electoral College. Although this is an almost irrelevant power as the house ha s not exercised it since 1824.Overall, it is apparent that members of both chambers are paid equal amounts, even though this is not an overriding argument for the two holding equal powers, it does add weight to them both having relatively equal powers, with the Senate receiving a greater amount of status within American Politics, this does not however mean they have an increased amount of power, the house is purely hindered by some factors such as the amount of members, which so makes many claim the Senate to be far more powerful than the House of Representatives, when the reality is slightly contrasting.