Juvenile Justice Essay

Morals usually are the guiding principles in just almost e very(prenominal)bodys life. Humans generally tend to do what is considered to be reform and astray from what is wrong, but in some cases, people hire to do what is considered wrong. However, people conceive that children should be dealt with much much light because theyre non adults yet. On the other hand, I resist that children should be exempt from punishment, and I fully agree with the four legal experts that believe a child who passs a heinous crime should be punished with a prison sentence of life without parole. The eighth amendment bans cruel and odd punishment to protect its citizens. If a child plucks a murder and goes unpunished, is that not a cruel punishment for the victims family? In Jennifer Jenkins On Punishment and Teen Killers, she states that there is no regard to the imp figure on victims families(10). The justice system is not doing its job if it is not getting justice for the victims family. Therefore it would be unconstitutional for the law to not punish the criminal for their heinous crime. Additionally, there have been researches and studies conducted in parliamentary law to answer why teenagers act the way they do. Research shows that the brain is the very reason for these childrens actions. In Paul Thompsons article blow out of the water Finds on Teenage Brains, he claims, massive loss of brain meander loss occurs in the teen years and that it is, only being disoriented in the areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control(7). This may explain why children act in this horrific manner, but it does not give them an excuse to commit crime. A rebuttal to Thompsons claim of defense would be Marjie Lundstroms article Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes, when it points out theyre only kids. That is, until they resistant up. Until they commit crimes(4-5). Kids are kids until they choose to make an adult decision and commit a serious crime. Whether the cr iminal is eleven or seventeen, they are fashioning a conscious decision to engage in a crime. base on the premise that morals do not substantially budge from young adulthood to adulthood, the offender should know that their crime is wrong. Thus, thepunishment should be mandatory as a result of the offenders actions. Children should cover their dues, even if that means life in prison without parole. If crime is dealt with lightly now, it will only get worse as time progresses. A wise and responsible decision needs to be made so that society can have a more safe and tell future.